McNulty's on YouTube

In charge of the security, counter-terrorism, crime and policing departments, McNulty tells YouTube viewers about the governments' Respect Agenda.
Posted in 2007, it can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v-5L9j_kkc
McNulty talks about how the Agenda attempts to works alongside neighbour hood policing, local councils and communities, reiterating the idea that we live, work and socialise together, and should respect each other.
The preventative work in place, to try and restore Respect, includes improving parenting skills, keeping families together.
McNulty says: 'If young people are going the wrong way' as a last resort anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) are issued.

Policing Debate

McNulty hit back at the a few opposition Conservative members who he claimed, had ‘crossed that line’.

Instead, McNulty put forward a united front. He said: “There is enough to unite us when it comes to crime in London, because it is not going to disappear overnight on anybody's watch.”

The debate, based on policing in London, was on Thursday 27 March.

McNulty congratulated the police forces. He said: “I want to congratulate the Metropolitan police on all the work they do for us in London and Sir Ian Blair on the leadership that he has brought to the success of policing in London.”

With the elections looming, it seems that the parties are neck and neck.

McNulty alongside Brown in Stevenage

McNulty was spotted with Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Stevenage yesterday, as Brown launched Labour's local election campaign for the May 1st council elections.

At the launch, Brown promised to boost community policing

He said: "What people want to see and what we want to see all over the country is visible policing, policing on the ground, policing where you can see your policeman and woman on the street."

Affordable housing, services for young people and education are also priorities for the PM and he said in the next few years every secondary school across Stevenage will have been refurbished.

What do you Stevenage people think? Possible or impossible?

Cyber security

In response to an ICT related query by conservative Mark Pritchard, McNulty revealed on the 19th March 2008 the steps that have been adopted to improve cyber security and resilience across the government departments.

McNulty claimed that constant monitoring and upgrading of government networks, including the GSI – the government’s intranet, were measures in place to protect cyber security.

GCHQ (the Government Communications Headquarters) – a British intelligence agency, also provides assurance to the UK government through warnings, alerts and emergency response.

MP attends Hindu Holi Festival

MP Tony McNulty attended a Hindu spring festival celebration on Saturday [22nd March 08], accompanied by Councillor Navin Shah, leader of the Labour Group at Harrow Council, and fellow MP Gareth Thomas.

McNulty said: "We get to celebrate the spring. The weather may not be spring but in peoples hearts it is."

Harrow's Hindu community celebrated the religious festival of Holi Dhamaka at the Shree Kutch Leva Patel Community India Gardens, in West End Road, Northolt, where guests threw coloured powder and dye over one another, ate Indian food and listened to live music.

The festival is based on the story of Holika and Prahalad, who worshipped his God, Vishnu, against the wishes of his father Hiranyakashyap. Hiranyakashyap demanded his son say he was superior to God and, when Prahalad refused, he decided to try and kill him. He asked Holika, his sister, who had been made immune to flames by the Gods, to kill Prahalad by sitting with him in a fire. But when she did so her magic powers were taken away and her nephew was saved, while she burned to ashes.

A bonfire was made at the event in celebration of the story and offerings of coconuts, dates and popcorn were put on it.

Tasers to discipline

Back in July 2007, McNulty gave his approval for firearms officers (experienced police officers entitled to carry firearms such as pistols or rifles) to carry Tasers – weapons which stun and pacify a target from a distance.

This was an attempt to reduce the need for officers to carry firearms, but still have some form of defence in violent situations.

Figures revealed by McNulty on 18 March 08 show that Tasers have been used in such circumstances.

McNulty said that figures on Taser use will be published in May, August and November on the Home Office Scientific Development Branch (HOSDB) website.

Recording crime has stepped up a notch

McNulty explained today how changes have been made in recording crime. Thus the term ‘violent crime’ is no longer used; instead figures for the ‘violence against a person’ offence have been developed.

Does the common use of guns, knives even in violence come under the 'violent against the person offence'?

Are the so called ‘violence against a person’ offences a vague, rounded off definition which you have difficulty understanding… just more political jargon to add to the list?

Reworked crime statistics, to adhere to this new type of offence, show that 'violent against the person’ offences recorded by the police in Harrow, dropped between 2005/6 (3,028 offences) and 2006/7 (2,870 offences).

As a Harrow boy, a Harrow girl, or just a Harrow inhabitant, did you feel safer, less likely to be battered, smacked or violently attacked than you did in 2006?

I didn't think so.

The future of Warwickshire bobbies is in his hands

MCNULTY has called Warwickshire county police bosses to Westminster to discuss a possible 12.9% tax increase, to cover the funds for the police’s slice of council tax bills.

If the council tax rise is not accepted, bobbies (policemen) in Warwickshire, among the smallest police force outside of London, may be lost due to inadequate funds.

The showdown will take place on April 2.

Tax money to be put to effective use. Or so we hope.

As a result of allegations that our tax paying money isn't being utilised effectively, Tony McNulty and other MPs will have to submit receipts for all expense claims over £25.
Currently, only receipts for expenses over £250 pounds have to be kept, but from April 1 things will change.
This move stems from the recent discovery that Conservative MP Derek Conway paid his son for office work.
Will this deter MPs from claiming unnecessary expenses?
Let's hope that our tax paying money will be brought to some use.

A rather DOGmatic response

McNulty rejected the proposal to create offences for the ‘grooming’ and ‘radicalisation’ of vulnerable people by terrorists/extremist organisations on the 5 March 2008.

In a response to the request, littered with words often coupled with dogs, by Labour MP for Luton South, Margaret Moran, McNulty said: “There are no current plans for additional legislation to create specific offences of ‘grooming’ and ‘radicalising’.

“The 2006 Terrorism Act introduced offences regarding the encouragement of terrorism which we believe are sufficient in this regard.”

Under the 2006 Terrorism Act, an individual found guilty of an offence for training for terrorism shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding ten years, or to a fine.

Is this harsh enough though?

And will it do the trick of deterring a similar action in the future?

Parliament at your finger tips.. if you like?

Did you know that from your couch or computer chair, you could be in Parliament at the click of a button? Well not exactly inside Parliament, but near enough.

You can see scripts in the form of an official report of the proceedings and debates of the UK Parliament.

Hansard is the name of this record. Hansard contains a word for word report of all speeches, questions and answers, and statements.

There are separate volumes for the House of Commons and House of Lords.

It takes its name from Luke Hansard who succeeded William Cobbett shortly after he began the reporting of the House of Commons in 1807.

In addition to the Parliament of the United Kingdom and the UK's devolved institutions, a Hansard is maintained for the Parliaments of Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago.

Origins of Hansard

Before 1771, the British Parliament had long been a highly secretive body.

The official record of the actions of the House was publicly available, but there was no such record of debates.

Publishing remarks made in the House became a breach of Parliamentary privilege, punishable by the two Houses.

As more people became interested in parliamentary debates, more individuals published unofficial accounts of parliamentary debates. Editors were at worst subjected to fines.

In 1771 Brass Crosby, who was Mayor of London at the time, brought before him a printer called Miller who dared publish reports of Parliamentary proceedings. He released the man, but he was subsequently ordered to appear before the House to explain his actions. Crosby, when brought to trial several judges refused to hear the case and after protests from the public Crosby was released.

Parliament ceased to punish the publishing of its debates, partly due to the campaigns of John Wilkes on the behalf of free speech.

There then began several attempts to publish reports of debates.

Among the early successes, the Parliamentary Register published by John Almon and John Debrett began in 1775 and ran until 1813.

William Cobbett, a noted radical and publisher began publishing Parliamentary Debates as a supplement to his Political Register in 1802, eventually extending his reach back with the Parliamentary History.

Cobbett's reports were printed by a member of the Hansard family from 1809 and in 1812, with his business suffering, Cobbett sold the Debates to Hansard.

From 1829 the name ‘Hansard’ appeared on the title page of each issue.

So Hansard takes its name from a member of the Hansard family who succeeded William Cobbett shortly after he began the reporting of the House of Commons.

You can view the most recent goings on in Parliament at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/pahansard.htm

Ban YouTube and similar sites to prevent the internet being used as a tool for terrorism?

To combat terrorism, McNulty is attempting to reduce the potential for the internet to be used by extremist groups.

He is, according to a meeting on the 4th March: “Working with law enforcement and industry partners to target extremist use of the internet and where there is illegal material we are working to remove it.

“Under the Terrorism Act 2000/2006 this includes material that encourages terrorism”

McNulty will be “talking to industry, and those in the community, about what more can be done to protect communities from extremist exploitation of the internet.”

Would an easier option be to ban websites such as YouTube where potentially extremist material can easily be posted i.e. Saddam Hussein’s execution was never broadcast on television but was readily available on YouTube.

Such user generated content is difficult to monitor, and could be used as the basis for a terrorist attack.

Does this mean that all user generated content such as blogging sites and websites where members could easily be recruited or approached, such as Facebook should be removed too?

Are we being given too much freedom to express ourselves, such that it has the potential to damage our own security?

Is McNulty attempting the impossible in trying to track the internet, which is so vast and so readily accessible?

MPs declaring the gifts, benefits and hospitality they receive - a step [toward invasion] too far?

Are MPs having their lives invaded upon?

The fact that most of their lives are tracked – their speeches in parliament are posted on the internet and they are often followed by the ever hungry press, suggests that this may be the case.

I mean, most of this blog is based on what I can scramble together from the Internet.

To worsen the matter, even aspects which you could consider ‘social’ or ‘personal’ matters, of the MPs lives are being exposed in the Register of Members' Interests

Reading entries into this makes me feel as if I am spying on McNulty.

As he logs his movement, it’s like your travelling in his back pocket.

For example, on the 5th June 2007, McNulty wrote in the Register of Members' Interests: ‘I received travel, tickets and hospitality for the FA Cup Final in Cardiff in May 2006; tickets and hospitality for the FA Cup semi-final in Birmingham in April 2006, and occasional hospitality and tickets at Upton Park for home games, all as a guest of West Ham United Football Club. (Registered 13 May 2006)’

Thankfully he doesn’t give the exact dates within the months specified, or else I would feel like a stalker-beyond-a-stalker.

Does he not sound like a prisoner as he seems to declare his life to a mere Register?

You can gather from the information posted that McNulty may be a West Ham football club fan.

The Register is apparently not intended to be an indicator of a Member's personal wealth. While it may not indicate McNulty’s personal wealth, the word personal should be given special focus.

To what extent should McNulty be accessible?

Should aspects of his personal life not be kept separate from his working life?

Apparently not.

The compulsory Register of Members' Interests was established in 1974, voted for by the House of Commons.

Please note the word compulsory- it was enforced, so poor McNulty probably has little say in the matter.

MPs are required to declare in the register the sources of any extra income or gifts which they receive so that there can be no suspicion that their behaviour in Parliament is unduly influenced by outside interests.

The purpose of the Register is to encourage transparency. It is "to provide information of any pecuniary interest or other material benefit which a Member receives which might reasonably be thought by others to influence his or her actions, speeches or votes in Parliament, or actions taken in the capacity of a Member of Parliament" (Code of Conduct and Guide to the Rules relating to the Conduct of Members, HC (2005-06) 351, paragraph 9.)

'Entries made in the Register aim to give a clear description of the nature and scope of the interests declared. Subject to the Rules, however, each Member is responsible for the content and style of his or her own entry' – a sign of a wee bit of freedom then?

On a general level, McNulty, according to theyworkforyou.com, voted very strongly against a transparent parliament. Would you not feel like prey if you were McNulty?

The register is published annually and is available for public inspection.

I guess you could argue that seeing as its been around for so long, it’s the status quo, and wont be changed. But then again, is it fair?